MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220742396 · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2022.106194

Organic carbon stocks, quality and prediction in permafrost-affected forest soils in North Canada

2022· article· en· W4220742396 on OpenAlex
Marcus Schiedung, Severin-Luca Bellè, Avni Malhotra, Samuel Abiven

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCATENA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungAurora Research InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPermafrostSoil waterSoil carbonTaigaEnvironmental scienceTotal organic carbonSoil scienceBorealGeologyEnvironmental chemistryChemistryForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-latitude soils store a large amount of the global soil organic carbon (SOC). The SOC stocks in mineral soils under different permafrost conditions, however, are underrepresented in global carbon databases. We sampled mineral forest soils under continuous and discontinuous to sporadic permafrost conditions on the Canadian Boreal and Taiga Plain. We determined the SOC stocks in the upper 60 cm of 94 soil pits across eleven sites (5–9 pits per site) and SOC quality using 13C isotopic signatures, C:N ratios and composition of aliphatic/aromatic and cellulose/lignin-like compounds obtained from mid-infrared spectra analyses. Lastly, we evaluated the prediction of SOC stocks in these soils using mid-infrared spectra and partial least square regression modelling (PLSR). The SOC stocks were on average four times higher in soils under continuous permafrost conditions (93.7–203.8 Mg SOC ha−1 in 0–45 cm) compared to soils under discontinuous to sporadic permafrost conditions (26.7–60.2 Mg SOC ha−1 in 0–60 cm). In addition, the SOC stocks were larger at moist and wet locations compared to dryer locations and varied significantly between sites, stressing the importance of small-scale geomorphic differences in controlling SOC in boreal mineral forest soils. Continuous permafrost SOC had a lower degree of decomposition compared to soils under discontinuous and sporadic permafrost. This indicates a potentially large proportion of SOC in boreal mineral soils to be vulnerable to warming associate increases in decomposition. The combination of mid-infrared with PLSR was suitable to predict the SOC stocks (R2 > 0.8) with an average uncertainty of 14–23%, which was less than the observed spatial variability of the field replicates (29–41%). Mid-infrared spectroscopy can thus offer an alternative to fill SOC data gaps of high latitude mineral forest soils and reduce uncertainties originating from the limited number of currently available SOC observations of Canadian boreal mineral forest soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it