Longitudinal Assessment of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion <scp>Diffusion‐Weighted MRI</scp> Metrics in Cognitive Decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Advanced diffusion‐based MRI biomarkers may provide insight into microstructural and perfusion changes associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Purpose To assess longitudinal microstructural and perfusion changes using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) parameters in cognitively impaired (CI) and healthy control (HC) groups. Study Type Prospective/longitudinal. Population Twelve CI patients (75% female) and 13 HC subjects (69% female). Field Strength/Sequence 3 T; Spin‐Echo‐IVIM‐DWI. Assessment Two MRI scans were performed with a 12‐month interval. ADC and IVIM‐DWI metrics (diffusion coefficient [D] and perfusion fraction [f]) were generated from monoexponential and biexponential fits, respectively. Additionally, voxel‐based correlations were evaluated between change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (ΔMoCA) and baseline imaging parameters. Statistical Tests Analysis of covariance with sex and age as covariates was performed for main effects of group and time (false discovery rate [FDR] corrected) with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Partial‐η2 and Hedges' g were used for effect‐size analysis. Spearman's correlations (FDR corrected) were used for the relationship between ΔMoCA score and imaging. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Significant differences were found for the main effects of group (HC vs. CI) and time. For group effects, higher ADC, IVIM‐D, and IVIM‐f were observed in the CI group compared to HC (ADC: 1.23 ± 0.08.10−3 vs. 1.09 ± 0.07.10−3 mm2/sec; IVIM‐D: 0.82 ± 0.01.10−3 vs. 0.73 ± 0.01.10−3 mm2/sec; and IVIM‐f: 0.317 ± 0.008 vs. 0.253 ± 0.009). Significantly higher ADC, IVIM‐D, and IVIM‐f values were observed in the CI group after 12 months (ADC: 1.45 ± 0.05.10−3 vs. 1.50 ± 0.07.10−3 mm2/sec; IVIM‐D: 0.87 ± 0.01.10−3 vs. 0.94 ± 0.02.10−3 mm2/sec; and IVIM‐f: 0.303 ± 0.007 vs. 0.332 ± 0.008), but not in the HC group at large effect size. ADC, IVIM‐D, and IVIM‐f negatively correlated with ΔMoCA score (ρ = −0.49, −0.51, and −0.50, respectively). Data Conclusion These findings demonstrate that longitudinal differences between CI and HC cohorts can be measured using IVIM‐based metrics. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".