MétaCan
← all works

Global, regional, and national prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019: a systematic review and modelling analysis

2022· article· en· 1,260 citations· W4220761888 on OpenAlex· 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00511-7

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread
0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly important cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality worldwide. We aimed to estimate global, regional, and national COPD prevalence and risk factors to guide policy and population interventions. Methods For this systematic review and modelling study, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and CINAHL, for population-based studies on COPD prevalence published between Jan 1, 1990, and Dec 31, 2019. We included data reported using the two main case definitions: the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease fixed ratio (GOLD; FEV 1 /FVC<0·7) and the lower limit of normal (LLN; FEV 1 /FVC Findings We identified 162 articles reporting population-based studies conducted across 260 sites in 65 countries. In 2019, the global prevalence of COPD among people aged 30–79 years was 10·3% (95% CI 8·2–12·8) using the GOLD case definition, which translates to 391·9 million people (95% CI 312·6–487·9), and 7·6% (5·8–10·1) using the LLN definition, which translates to 292·0 million people (219·8–385·6). Using the GOLD definition, we estimated that 391·9 million (95% CI 312·6–487·9) people aged 30–79 years had COPD worldwide in 2019, with most (315·5 million [246·7–399·6]; 80·5%) living in LMICs. The overall prevalence of GOLD-COPD among people aged 30–79 years was the highest in the Western Pacific region (11·7% [95% CI 9·3–14·6]) and lowest in the region of the Americas (6·8% [95% CI 5·6–8·2]). Globally, male sex (OR 2·1 [95% CI 1·8–2·3]), smoking (current smoker 3·2 [2·5–4·0]; ever smoker 2·3 [2·0–2·5]), body-mass index of less than 18·5 kg/m 2 (2·2 [1·7–2·7]), biomass exposure (1·4 [1·2–1·7]), and occupational exposure to dust or smoke (1·4 [1·3–1·6]) were all substantial risk factors for COPD. Interpretation With more than three-quarters of global COPD cases in LMICs, tackling this chronic condition is a major and increasing challenge for health systems in these settings. In the absence of targeted population-wide efforts and health system reforms in these settings, many of which are under-resourced, achieving a substantial reduction in the burden of COPD globally might remain a difficult task. Funding National Institute for Health Research and Health Data Research UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Field
Medicine
Canadian institutions
Centre for Global Health Research
Funders
Department of Health and Social CareUK Research and InnovationNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchGovernment of the United Kingdom
Keywords
Pulmonary diseaseMEDLINECOPDDiseaseRisk assessmentSystematic reviewEpidemiologyChronic disease
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes