MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220762510 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggac119

Application of an unbalanced optimal transport distance and a mixed L1/Wasserstein distance to full waveform inversion

2022· article· en· W4220762510 on OpenAlexafffund
Da Li, Michael P. Lamoureux, Wenyuan Liao

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsInversion (geology)Normalization (sociology)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Full waveform inversion (FWI) is an important and popular technique in subsurface Earth property estimation. In this paper, several improvements to the FWI methodology are developed and demonstrated with numerical examples, including a simple two-layer seismic velocity model, a cross borehole Camembert model and a surface seismic Marmousi model. We introduce an unbalanced optimal transport (UOT) distance with Kullback–Leibler divergence to replace the L2 distance in the FWI problem. Also, a mixed L1/Wasserstein distance is constructed that preserves the convex properties with respect to shift, dilation, and amplitude change operation. An entropy regularization approach and convolutional scaling algorithms are used to compute the distance and the gradient efficiently. Two strategies of normalization methods that transform the seismic signals into non-negative functions are discussed. The numerical examples are then presented at the end of the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207