Individual-level distance-independent-based growth and yield prediction models for long-term Japanese cedar (<i>Cryptomeria japonica</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yield prediction has been determined to be vital in sustainable forest management. Recently, research trends have shifted from stand-level to individual-level yield prediction. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of yield prediction models based on a distance-independent approach for Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica (L.f.) D.Don) trees in western Japan. We further examined the accuracy of the models with reference to existing data collected over the long-term. First, we constructed distance-independent height, diameter growth, and survival models. Then, we simulated for approximately 50 years individual tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and volume growth using the test data. We then compared the predicted and observed values and calculated root-mean-square error (RMSE) and bias to evaluate the model accuracy. The models were noted to perform well when predicting mean height, DBH, and volume for Japanese cedar trees; in fact, they adequately predicted the diameter distribution. Our results suggest that distance-independent models could adequately predict long-term mean values and diameter distribution. However, RMSE and bias indicated that error propagation occurred over longer time spans. Thus, it is effective to conduct actual measurements at some point in the forest development phase and use the measurements as initial values for short- or medium-term predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".