Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Where genocide is concerned, the uses of memory and time are many. Time is encoded in memories, and the persistence of memory is one of the hallmarks of our humanity. Memory relative to the study of genocide is fraught with divisions. The term is often misunderstood, such that any example of human rights abuse can often become “genocide” in popular discourse. It can be abused and applied for political, ideological, or dogmatic ends. France in the aftermath of World War II provides a case in point, when both genocide perpetration and genocide victimhood took place simultaneously through the collaborationist French government at Vichy. This presents us with an illustration of the uses of memory in a situation of genocide. This essay considers those who shape memory, where any discussion relating to the use of memory needs to consider what happens when parochial actors seek to exploit historical memory (or historical amnesia) for reasons other than a quest for scholarly truth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it