MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220766233 · doi:10.1002/adsc.202200094

Three‐Component Coupling of α‐Trifluoromethyl Carbonyls, Azides and Amines for the Regioselective Synthesis of 1,4,5‐Trisubstituted 1,2,3‐Triazoles

2022· article· en· W4220766233 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ge Gao, Kuantao, Mao Mao, Leiyang Lv, Zhiping Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Synthesis & Catalysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicClick Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRenmin University of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMcGill University
KeywordsRegioselectivityChemistryCycloadditionAmideAmine gas treatingSurface modificationCombinatorial chemistryCatalysisCoupling reactionComponent (thermodynamics)MoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A metal‐free three‐component coupling of α‐CF 3 carbonyls, azides and amines for the regioselective synthesis of 1,4,5‐trisubstituted 1,2,3‐triazoles in the air is established. Various substituted 4‐amide 1,2,3‐triazoles were obtained when the enolizable α‐CF 3 ketones were applied in aqueous reaction medium. Control and 18 O‐labelling experiments revealed that the in situ generated β‐oxo amide was responsible for the formal oxygen‐shift and the subsequent [3+2] cycloaddition reaction, with amine as both the catalyst and reactant. In the case of non‐enolizable α‐CF 3 esters, the densely functionalized 5‐amino 1,2,3‐triazoles were achieved exclusively, which could enable the late‐stage functionalization of complex biological molecules. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Synthesis & CatalysisSame topicClick Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207