MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220766860 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4084

3D characterization of garnet from metamorphic sole amphibolite of ophiolite from the central Dinarides

2022· preprint· en· W4220766860 on OpenAlexaff
Dražen Balen, Marko Kudrna Prašek, Pia Pleše, Hans‐Joachim Massonne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtolithMetamorphic rockGeologyOphioliteGeochemistryAmphiboleGeothermobarometryMetamorphismLawsoniteKyaniteUltramafic rockMetamorphic faciesEclogiteMassifSubductionGeomorphologyQuartzSeismologyTectonicsPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The textural and chemical characteristics of garnet blasts have been routinely used to provide useful indicators on the rock evolution. However, a more precise 3D characterization of mineral volumes and relations leads to a better understanding of particular metamorphic processes. The Dinarides, a mountain chain in south-eastern Europe, comprises ultramafic massifs and metamorphic rocks that are relics of ophiolite complexes, which originated along the contact of the European plate and the Adria microplate during the Alpine orogeny. The associated regional geodynamic processes brought in contact hot upper mantle and cold subducted material leading to the formation of high-grade garnet-bearing amphibolites (“metamorphic sole”). A clockwise pressure-temperature path with maximum pressure conditions of 2.1 GPa (ca. 70 km depth) at temperatures around 800 °C was determined for such an amphibolite (Krivaja-Konjuh ultramafic massif (KKUM), Bosnia and Herzegovina) that originated from a N-MORB protolith (Balen & Massonne, 2021). These conditions were followed by a nearly isothermal pressure decrease to 0.4 GPa. Pyrope-almandine garnet, rich in mineral inclusions (plagioclase, amphibole, clinopyroxene, ilmenite, rutile, titanite), is a major mineral in metamorphic sole amphibolites from KKUM. Around garnet, fine-grained symplectites usually form a corona (kelyphite), which consists of Ca-amphibole, plagioclase and opaque phases. A plausible explanation of the observed kelyphite is its formation during rapid decompression caused by the uplift of deep-seated rocks for more than 50 km. We conducted a micro-scale 3D tomography of mineral blasts in metamorphic sole amphibolites from KKUM using phase-contrast synchrotron radiation computed microtomography (SR μCT) at the SYRMEP beamline (Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste facility). This X-ray micro-tomography allowed us to retrieve micro-scale morphologic features of minerals, mineral inclusions and symplectites in order to quantify their 3D shapes, dimensions, spatial distribution and orientation. We obtained a full high-precision 3D characterization of the mineral volume and textural description including the 3D morphological features of the smallest components. Statistically relevant data were gathered to study the garnet crystallization and decomposition history and thus the metamorphic evolution of the garnet-bearing amphibolites. Preliminary SR μCT results indicate garnet grains which vary in size from 150 to 1500 µm in diameter. Their associated reaction rims show a thickness from 5 to 60 µm. Initial measurements indicate the tendency of thicker reaction rims around smaller grains. Further 3D measurements and data treatment to statistically describe the entire garnet and reaction rim populations will follow. The tomography combined with electron microprobe analyses of minerals, whole-rock chemistry and thermodynamic modelling gave us already insights into the growth stages and resorption of garnet as well as the growth of corona minerals. We will use this information to decipher the amount, nature and morphology of mineral grains formed at different stages of the metamorphic evolution. The 3D approach provides many additional details that can be easily overlooked when only a classical petrological approach to the study of the aforementioned amphibolites is applied. Balen, D., Massonne, H.-J. (2021). Lithos 394-395, 106184.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207