MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220767189 · doi:10.1088/1752-7163/ac5e4f

Infrared cavity ring-down spectroscopy for detecting non-small cell lung cancer in exhaled breath

2022· article· en· W4220767189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Breath Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersMitacsNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsBreath gas analysisLung cancerExhalationCavity ring-down spectroscopyReceiver operating characteristicSpectroscopyMedicineExhaled airInternal medicineRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early diagnosis of lung cancer greatly improves the likelihood of survival and remission, but limitations in existing technologies like low-dose computed tomography have prevented the implementation of widespread screening programs. Breath-based solutions that seek disease biomarkers in exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles show promise as affordable, accessible and non-invasive alternatives to traditional imaging. In this pilot work, we present a lung cancer detection framework using cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS), an effective and practical laser absorption spectroscopy technique that has the ability to advance breath screening into clinical reality. The main aims of this work were to (1) test the utility of infrared CRDS breath profiles for discriminating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients from controls, (2) compare models with VOCs as predictors to those with patterns from the CRDS spectra (breathprints) as predictors, and (3) present a robust approach for identifying relevant disease biomarkers. First, based on a proposed learning curve technique that estimated the limits of a model's performance at multiple sample sizes (10-158), the CRDS-based models developed in this work were found to achieve classification performance comparable or superior to like mass spectroscopy and sensor-based systems. Second, using 158 collected samples (62 NSCLC subjects and 96 controls), the accuracy range for the VOC-based model was 65.19%-85.44% (51.61%-66.13% sensitivity and 73.96%-97.92% specificity), depending on the employed cross-validation technique. The model based on breathprint predictors generally performed better, with accuracy ranging from 71.52%-86.08% (58.06%-82.26% sensitivity and 80.21%-88.54% specificity). Lastly, using a protocol based on consensus feature selection, three VOCs (isopropanol, dimethyl sulfide, and butyric acid) and two breathprint features (from a local binary pattern transformation of the spectra) were identified as possible NSCLC biomarkers. This research demonstrates the potential of infrared CRDS breath profiles and the developed early-stage classification techniques for lung cancer biomarker detection and screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it