MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220770225 · doi:10.1515/pubhef-2021-0140

Covid-19 und Public-Health-Ethik. Gerechtigkeit ernst nehmen

2022· article· de· W4220770225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health Forum · 2022
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceHumanitiesPhilosophyMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung Zentraler Ausgangspunkt für die ethische Diskussion public-health-bezogener Fragen, wie dem Pandemiemanagement, ist die bestehende soziale Ungleichheit in der Gesundheit und die damit zusammenhängende soziale Gerechtigkeit. Hieraus entsteht kein Widerspruch zwischen Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit. Freiheitliche Grundrechte können nur ausgehend von einem gerechtigkeitsbezogenen Ansatz gesichert werden. Auf dieser Basis müssen Vulnerabilitäten identifiziert und Maßnahmen entwickelt werden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.176
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.159
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1760.159
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0370.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0020.045
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.327
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it