MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220779155 · doi:10.1002/pne2.12077

Special issue on pain and intellectual and developmental disabilities

2022· editorial· en· W4220779155 on OpenAlexaff
Chantel C. Burkitt, Lara M. Genik

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatric and Neonatal Pain · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphThames Valley Children's CentreLibrary and Archives Canada
FundersOffice of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health
KeywordsIntellectual disabilityPsychologyPopulationChronic painTypically developingDevelopmental psychologyPain assessmentClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryPain managementPhysical therapyAutism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Children with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) represent a diverse group with conditions that begin during the developmental period and are associated with physical, learning, language, behavioral, and/or intellectual-based impairments. These impairments also frequently impact day-to-day functioning, generally lasting throughout a person's lifetime.1 Because of the work of pioneering researchers in the field, pain is now understood to be a common and complex occurrence for children with IDD.2 Indeed, under certain circumstances and contrary to historical beliefs, children with IDD compared to typically developing peers may actually be more sensitive to pain3 and demonstrate greater pain evoked potentials.4 Children with IDD also undergo more frequent and more invasive painful medical events5 and are more likely to experience chronic pain compared to typically developing peers.6, 7 Unfortunately, children with IDD are also more likely to have limitations in their ability to communicate about their pain effectively, which impacts their ability to effectively utilize self-report pain assessment measures or advocate for their own pain relief.8 Caregivers may be apt to underestimate the pain of their children with IDD9, 10 or may have difficulty communicating their concerns to their healthcare providers. As a result, pain is often missed or under-recognized as well as poorly or undermanaged.2 Despite this well-documented clinical problem, research on pain in this population has been slow-moving and wrought with challenges. Indeed, children with IDD are often excluded from pain research, and any research including this population has many associated ethical and logistical challenges. In our opinion, the most significant outcomes from research to date include (a) evidence documenting the problem of pain as a significant challenge for children with IDD and (b) the development of valid and reliable observational pain assessment tools. Despite the development of the tools, however, there remains an extensive knowledge-to-practice gap in terms of using the assessment tools across home, respite, and clinical settings. As a field, we need to address these practice gaps as we also pursue scientific efforts to inform pain management approaches for children with IDD. We are encouraged by recent work; for example, a pain assessment toolbox and clinical practice points specific to pain in children with physical disabilities were developed and disseminated,11, 12 pain education programs have been developed for caregivers and tested for effectiveness,13-15 and while still severely limited, studies are starting to emerge focused on understanding pain management approaches in this population.16-20 This special issue features important and diverse research spanning pain prevalence, assessment, and management in children with IDD. We are also pleased to highlight a knowledge mobilization project focused on impacting care and the human experience. This special issue begins with an invited narrative commentary where Carter and colleagues describe how they harnessed the power of storytelling to create awareness around pain in children with IDD.21 Using their multidisciplinary expertise (qualitative researcher, writer, animator) and in collaboration with parents, a short video was created to powerfully capture and illuminate the lived experience of parents caring for a non-verbal child with IDD and chronic pain. The final product educates in a way that academic literature simply cannot—with profound emotion and human connection. The commentary describing the creation of this product is informative to anyone working to create impactful knowledge mobilization products that call for action to elicit change. Next, Andersen and colleagues present the protocol for their large-scale international survey quantifying pain prevalence, burden, and pain management practices in children with cerebral palsy (CP).22 In this study, mothers' and fathers' perspectives are invited as well as the child with CP's self-report (when able) and siblings serve as controls. The CPPain program, including the survey described, was developed in close collaboration with users, including individuals with CP and their families. This foundational work aims to inform the development of interventions to support better assessment and management of pain in clinical practice around the world. As noted above, communication of pain for children with IDD can be a challenge. Fitzpatrick and colleagues describe how three children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with intellectual disability undertook training to use a pain scale and to request their preferred pain relief strategies.23 Pain communication training could be an important part of understanding and reducing challenging behaviors in children with ASD who have ongoing pain. There has been a paucity of research studies broadly exploring pain treatment approaches in IDD, and even less is known about the utility of non-pharmacological interventions. Ostojic and colleagues report a mixed methods study assessing the acceptability and feasibility of using a biofeedback-assisted relaxation training as an intervention for chronic pain management in children with CP.24 This pilot study highlights the ways in which biofeedback—used via an iOS application—was feasible and beneficial as noted by both children and their parents. To conclude the special issue, Boyer and colleagues characterized pain in the context of orthopedic surgery in children with CP.25 While the intent of orthopedic surgery is to have a positive impact on function and pain, pain before and after surgery has rarely been reported in CP. Pain prevalence and orthopedic outcomes were documented retrospectively and factors that predicted pain at 1-year follow-up were identified. This study emphasizes the importance of attending to chronic pain before surgery to improve pain and functional outcomes. These five papers, originating from around the world, report on innovative approaches to understanding the complexities of pain in children with IDD. Initiatives like the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)'s 2019 global year of pain in the most vulnerable as well as IASP's new Special Interest Group on Pain and Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (PIDDSIG) and this current special issue with Paediatric and Neonatal Pain are all examples of recent momentum to bring attention to pain and IDD. These initiatives, among others, aim to mobilize researchers and healthcare providers to work together and with children with IDD and their families to generate clinically relevant knowledge and ultimately to ensure that knowledge improves the lives of children with IDD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatric and Neonatal PainSame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207