MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220788586 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2022.3162239

Distributed Secure Estimation Against Unknown FDI Attacks and Load Deviation in Multi-Area Power Systems

2022· article· en· W4220788586 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEstimatorElectric power systemObserver (physics)Computer scienceStandard deviationEstimationPower (physics)ScalabilityNoticeControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsControl (management)EngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief studies the distributed estimation problem for multi-area power systems where the sensor measurements encounter with false data injection (FDI) attacks. For the large load frequency control (LFC) power systems with unknown load deviation, a distributed intermediate observer based method is proposed to estimate the system states, FDI attack signals and load deviation of each area in the power system. In this case, the gain of each intermediate observer is obtained by constructing a self-relative linear matrix inequality that can be easily solved by the standard software packages. Notice that the computational cost of each estimator is low even though the scale of power systems is large. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by an illustrative example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it