Effect of Fault Extension Relevant to Unconformity on Hydrothermal Fluid Flow, Mass Transport, and Uranium Deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a conceptual model is developed based on common features of typical unconformity-related uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Canada. Three reactive flow modeling scenarios are designed to address the effect of fault extension on the formation of uranium deposits. Our results indicate that the location of the fault zone relevant to the unconformity is crucial to the fluid circulation in both the sandstone layer and the basement unit, the temperature distribution, the transport of aqueous components, and the uranium deposition. In particular, this research reveals that the circulating pattern of the basement brine is critical for the ore genesis. The reducing basal brine is capable of carrying aqueous uranium from depth to react with the shallow oxidizing fluid, being percolated to the basement from the overlain sandstone layer, for uranium precipitation. Scenarios 1 and 2, in which the fault zone is mainly in the basement, are in favor of focusing ore-forming hydrothermal fluids into the footwall area in the basement, leading to the formation of uranium deposits therein. Scenario 3, in which the fault zone is mainly in the sandstone layer with a limited extension below the unconformity, is unfavorable for the focusing of fluids, and hence no significant deposits can be formed, except for some minor uranium mineralization occurring in the footwall and other areas in the basement that are spatially associated with the upwelling flow zones in the sandstone layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".