Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The development of mitigation capabilities to counteract the detrimental impacts of space weather on critical ground infrastructure, such as power lines, pipelines and cables, depends on the availability of the observations of their causes as well as monitoring of the subsequent results.<br>Although direct monitoring of critical infrastructure response to GeoMagnetic Disturbances (GMD) has become more advanced in recent years, observations of geomagnetic variations continue to play the most important role in all aspects of development of safe and robust operational procedures and technology, from the forecast of geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) to their climatological studies.<br>This presentation shows how different types of geomagnetic data are utilised, from 3-hour and 1-hour geomagnetic indices to 1 sec. geomagnetic data, and from real-time to multi-year climatology in order to provide forecasts of GIC, identify the effects of different geomagnetic patterns on infrastructure response or provide “climatology” for network design considerations.  </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it