Synthesis and Prototyping of a 6-dof Parallel Robot for the Automatic Performance of Assembly Tasks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a 6-dof parallel robot for the performance of assembly tasks in a human-robot collaborative environment. The architecture and design of the robot are selected such that the robot is mechanically backdrivable. Thereby, the robot can physically interact with an environment or with humans without requiring the use of a force/torque sensor, which is the main objective of this work. The architecture of the robot is first described and its kinematic model is established. The Jacobian matrices are derived and an algorithm is presented for the determination of its workspace. The force capabilities of the robot are then established based on a proposed formulation. A prototype of the robot is presented and control schemes are developed, including a controller based on a vision system. Finally, a video demonstrating the experimental validation of the robot accompanies this paper. The video qualitatively demonstrates the interaction capabilities of the robot.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it