MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220796220 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-512

Oil in glacial till as drivers of ice streaming and surging

2022· preprint· en· W4220796220 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rebecca McCerery, John Woodward, Glen McHale, Kate Winter, Onoriode Esegbue, Martin Jones

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGlacierGlacial periodIce sheetIce streamSedimentOil sandsErosionGeomorphologyHydrology (agriculture)OceanographySea iceCryosphereGeotechnical engineeringArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The driving mechanisms of glacier fast flow and the cyclical instability inherent in ice streams and surging glaciers are not fully understood, with current theories of sliding and basal deformation being insufficient in explaining glacier dynamics. Previous work on soil water repellency and interfacial physics shows that the incorporation of a lubricating oil into a sediment enhances the water repellent and water shedding properties. This can form a Slippery Liquid-Infused Porous Surface (SLIPS), whereby a liquid-liquid interface is created when the sediment is exposed to water resulting in extreme water shedding. In Alberta, Canada, oil sands material has been detected in surficial sediment and in glacial sediments south of the Alberta Oil Sands deposits. It has been hypothesised that this material was eroded and transported subglacially during the Laurentide Glaciation. Here, sediments from the Central Alberta Ice Stream flow track in the former Laurentide Ice Sheet were analysed and compared to samples of the Alberta Oil Sands from mines and natural exposures using oil-oil correlation by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results show evidence of Alberta Oil Sands throughout the Central Alberta Ice Stream flow track, in particular at the terminating margins to the east of Calgary and in the Cooking Lake area to the southeast of Edmonton. These results indicate glacial erosion and long-distance mobilisation of oil sands deposits from Northern Alberta. Three scenarios of SLIPS at the ice-bed interface caused by the presence of a lubricating oil at the bed can be assumed from these results; (i) an oil-wet macroscale SLIPS, (ii) a water-wet macroscale SLIPS, and (iii) a microscale SLIPS. These SLIPS mechanisms would influence the degree of ice-bed coupling and therefore the proportion and rates of sliding and basal deformation. By understanding the physics occurring at the ice-bed interface it is possible to better predict glacier flow conditions. It is therefore critical that properties affecting wettability and water shedding of sediments such as the presence of an oil are considered in our understanding of transient flow conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→