MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220804029 · doi:10.46929/graciadeo.v4i1.102

Menghadapi Quarter Life Crisis dalam Terang Perspektif Alkitab

2022· article· en· W4220804029 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Salomo Hahuly

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL TEOLOGI GRACIA DEO · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Christian Leadership and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesArtPolitical scienceHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we discuss all things related to one phase in life that is the quarter life crisis and how to deal with it from a biblical point of view. Quarter life crisis is a situation where everyone will definitely experience it. The explanation in this article covers the meaning, an indication of a person being present during the quarter life crisis, to which aspect of life is vulnerable when a person is present during this quarter life crisis, also how to deal with the quarter life crisis. Looking at it from the point of view of the peace that God has given to the nation of Israel, it is hoped that it can provide motivation for everyone who is in the phase of the quarter life crisis.AbstrakDalam artikel ini membahas tentang segala hal yang berhubungan dengan salah satu fase dalam kehidupan yaitu adalah quarter life crisis dan bagaimana cara menghadapinya berdasarkan sudut pandang Alkitab. Quarter life crisis adalah suatut keadaan dimana semua orang pasti akan mengalaminya. Penjelasan dalam artikel ini meliputi pengertian, indikasi seseorang sedang ada dalam masa quarter life crisis, hingga aspek kehidupan mana yang rawan ketika seseorang sedang ada dalam masa quarter life crisis ini, juga bagaimana cara menghadapi masa quarter life crisis. Dengan melihat dari sudut pandang bagaimana damai sejahtera yang Allah berikan kepada bangsa Israel, diharapkan dapat memberikan motivasi bagi setiap orang yang sedang berada dalam fase quarter life crisi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL TEOLOGI GRACIA DEOSame topicContemporary Christian Leadership and EducationFrench-language works237,207