Identification of Multilinear Systems: A Brief Overview
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonlinear systems have been studied for a long time and have applications in numerous research fields. However, there is currently no global solution for nonlinear system identification, and different used approaches depend on the type of nonlinearity. An interesting class of nonlinear systems, with a wide range of popular applications, is represented by multilinear (or multidimensional) systems. These systems exhibit a particular property that may be exploited, namely that they can be regarded as linearly separable systems and can be modeled accordingly, using tensors. Examples of well-known applications of multilinear forms are multiple-input/single-output (MISO) systems and acoustic echo cancellers, used in multi-party voice communications, such as videoconferencing. Many important fields (e.g., big data, machine learning, and source separation) can benefit from the methods employed in multidimensional system identification. In this context, this chapter aims to briefly present the recent approaches in the identification of multilinear systems. Methods relying on tensor decomposition and modeling are used to address the large parameter space of such systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".