MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220807626 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-13531

Paleoproterozoic Cordilleran-Type Tectonics in central West Greenland

2022· preprint· en· W4220807626 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierpaolo Guarnieri, Diogo Rosa, Kristine Thrane, Thomas F. Kokfelt, Erik Vest Sørensen, Nigel Baker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryMetamorphismArcheanRiftCratonBack-arc basinGranuliteVolcanic arcPetrologyTectonicsPaleontologyStructural basinFaciesSubduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>A new tectonic model is presented to explain the tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Paleoproterozoic Karrat Group in central West Greenland and the polyphase deformation, magmatism and metamorphism in the Rinkian orogen recorded in Paleoproterozoic rocks and Archaean complexes. The Karrat Group (from c. 71°00’ to 73°00’ N) formed in an intra-cratonic sag basin after c. 2000 Ma with basal quartzites of the Qaarsukassak and Mârmorilik formations unconformably overlaying Archaean gneisses of the Rae Craton. From 1950 to 1900 Ma a carbonate platform represented by the Mârmorilik Formation developed toward the south, while rift related alkaline volcanic rocks represented by the alkaline member of the Kangilleq Formation and syn-rift siliciclastic and volcaniclastic sediments of the Nûkavsak Formation were deposited to the north. The rifting was succeeded by a back-arc system, represented by the transitional member of the Kangilleq Formation. Concomitantly with development of the back-arc system, arc-related granitoids of the Prøven Intrusive Complex (PIC) intruded into and along the basal contact of the Karrat Group around 1900 Ma with major pulses at c. 1870 and c. 1850 Ma. The Karrat Group and the magmatic arc rocks underwent HT-metamorphism at c. 1830–1800 Ma during the collisional phase of the Rinkian orogen. The metamorphic grade increases from greenschist facies in the south, to granulite facies in the north, where the metamorphism is associated with migmatization and emplacement of the S-type Qinngua leucogranites. Extensive thrust emplacement and folding characterize the Rinkian orogen south of the PIC and the eastern boundary of the magmatic arc is reworked along a top to ESE shear zone post-dating the HT-metamorphism. The ESE-ward emplacement of allochthonous thrust sheets during an early stage of thin-skinned tectonics is followed by NE-ward emplacement of basement nappes and finally by a NW-SE compression stage resulting in tectonic inversion of basin normal faults.  The back-arc extension and Cordilleran-type magmatism were driven by eastward subduction of oceanic crust during the Trans-Hudson Orogeny resulting from the convergence of the Superior, Meta Incognita and Rae Archean cratons between 1870–1800 Ma. The Karrat Group north of the PIC together with the time-correlative Piling Group of Baffin Island (Canada) probably represented the passive margin succession of the Rae craton that evolved into a forearc setting during the Trans-Hudson Orogeny. The Rinkian orogen is an example of Cordilleran-type tectonics resulting from the deformation of the Rae continental margin intruded by magmatic arc granites during subduction, followed by HT-metamorphism in the upper plate and the structuring of a back-arc fold and thrust system antithetic to the subducting plate.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207