Adopsi IoT Pada Core Process Trucking di Indonesia Dengan Menggunakan TOGAF Framework
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract

 
 
 Biaya logistik di Indonesia masih tergolong mahal yang disebabkan kurangnya infrastruktur, teknologi, kemampuan sumber daya manusia, kebijakan logistik pemerintah, terjadinya bencana alam, serta seringnya pungutan liar. Pelanggan belum menerima informasi secara real time. Hal ini dapat berdampak kepada kepuasan pelanggan serta terlambatnya proses pembayaran dari pelanggan. Untuk menjawab tantangan-tantangan ini, pelaku usaha trucking diharuskan untuk melakukan inovasi serta meningkatkan kinerja dan utilisasi kendaraan yang dimiliki terutama dengan pemanfaatan teknologi internet of things (IoT). Implementasi teknologi IoT pada perusahaan trucking memerlukan perencanaan enterprise architecture, sehingga teknologi yang diimplemntasikan sesuai dengan kebutuhan bisnis. Pada jurnal ini akan membahas bagaimana pemanfaatan teknologi IoT dalam mendukung tujuan bisnis dan proses operasional pada core process perusahaan trucking di Indonesia, serta memberikan rekomendasi enterprise architecture sesuai TOGAF yang dapat diimplementasikan pada core process bisnis trucking di Indonesia. Rekomendasi enterprise architecture divisualisasikan melalui archimate, sehingga dapat dengan mudah dipahami dan diadptasi oleh pelaku usaha bisnis trucking atau pemerintah.
 
 
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it