Determination of the General Formula to Estimate the Discharge Quantity of Composite Structure for Free Flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
River and open channel flow measurement is regarded as an important element in improving water system management. An experimental analysis in a laboratory flume has been executed to obtain formulas which can be used to predict the discharge quantity which crosses over the sharp crested weir and under the gate in the composite structure which is a tool of flow measurement. These formulas are applied for the free flow condition. Different configurations of composite structure have been used. These configurations have regular and irregular shapes. The derivation of the discharge quantity equation is based on the dimensional analysis which is employed to analyze the factors that control the operation of the composite structure. The family of formulas consists of eight formulas that are divided into two groups. The first group consists of four formulas which are derived based on the variable that dominates the hydraulic behavior of the composite structure, while the second group consists of four formulas based on the same variables of the first group but taking into consideration the effect of weir and gate shape by adopting the hydraulic radius of weir and gate. Based on the evaluation process, all formulas can be used perfectly well to predict the discharge quantity, regardless of the shape of weir and gate. On the other hand, based on the validation process, the formula that considered the effects of shape geometry, flow and fluid properties has given the best prediction of the discharge quantity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".