MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220828562 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6127

Using P-T-t estimates to identify and restore out-of-sequence thrusting in the lower part of the Kalak Nappe Complex (Nordkinnhalvøya, Sværholthalvøya), internal Scandinavian Caledonides, Finnmark, N. Norway

2022· preprint· en· W4220828562 on OpenAlexaff
A. H. N. Rice, Fred Gaidies, Olivier K. A. Heldwein, Maria Thereza Akemi Guimarães Yogi, Jamie Cutts, Matthjis A. Smit

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNappeMetamorphic rockMetamorphismGeologyGeochemistryPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tectonometamorphic evolution of the Kalak Nappe Complex in the northernmost Scandinavian Caledonides is currently uncertain; at least two pre-Caledonian events have been locally recognised within the complex, as well as Caledonian events. To help clarify the evolution of the complex, we document here the P-T-t paths of garnet growth, which represent the peak metamorphic conditions within this relatively unstudied external part of the complex. Metamorphic P-T paths for the lower part of the Kalak Nappe Complex were obtained using the THERIA_G model of Gaidies et al. (CMP 2008). In the model, equilibrium in the MnNCKFMASHT system was established across the entire rock-volume during prograde metamorphism, except for garnet, which developed growth zoning preserved at levels controlled by the kinetics of intracrystalline diffusion. The mass and composition of material used in successive increments of garnet growth is cumulatively subtracted from the matrix bulk-rock composition before calculating the P-T conditions of the next increment of garnet growth. There is some latitude with regards to the absolute metamorphic conditions determined using this model, due to the inherent uncertainty of the thermodynamic data and the approximation of the reactive volume composition. However, the slopes of the determined P-T paths, together with lithological, geochemical and Lu-Hf garnet whole-rock isotopic data and garnet crystal size frequency distributions, enabled the identification of three nappes in the study area; from lowest upwards, the Bekkarfjord, Veidnes and Kolvik nappes. An early, low-pressure Barrovian-type metamorphic event at ∼464 Ma is preserved in the Veidnes Nappe, where garnet cores (Grt 1V) give a P-T gradient of ∼15 bar/°C, with peak conditions of ∼560 °C and 4.5 kbar. That was followed by moderate-pressure metamorphism in the Bekkarfjord Nappe at ∼423 Ma, resulting in garnet crystallization (Grt 1B, core growth) along a gradient of ∼20 bar/°C, with peak conditions of ∼570 °C and 6.0 kbar. All three nappes then experienced Barrovian-type metamorphism at ∼420 Ma on a steep P-T gradient of ∼40 bar/°C, with peak conditions of ∼560 °C and 6.7 kbar in the Bekkarfjord and Veidnes nappes (Grt 2B, V, rim growth), while the overlying Kolvik Nappe was metamorphosed at peak conditions of ∼590 °C and 7.5 kbar (Grt 1K, core growth). We consider the latter two episodes (423, 420 Ma) to be different stages of the Scandian phase of the Caledonian Orogeny. The juxtaposition of the three nappes, with the youngest event having occurred in the structurally highest unit and the oldest event now being sandwiched between the two younger events indicates out-of-sequence thrusting associated with the final continent-continent collision. This has been modeled in “balanced” cross-sections of the ductile thrusting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→