MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220833865 · doi:10.1186/s40814-022-01020-4

Correction to: A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing Bankart repair and remplissage with the Latarjet procedure in patients with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol

2022· erratum· en· W4220833865 on OpenAlexaff
Asheesh Bedi, Ryan M. Degen, Jon J.P. Warner, Mohit Bhandari, Kim Madden, Nazanin Barkhordari, Míriam Garrido Clua, Kelsey Wozny, Jaydeep Moro, Matthew Denkers, Olufemi R. Ayeni, Robert Litchfield, Diane Bryant, Stacey Wanlin, Andrew Firth, Stephanie Horst, Katelyn Inch, Peter Lapner, Katie McIlquham, Montserrat Garcia Portabella, Jorge H. Núñez, Lledó Batalla, Josep Maria Doménech i Massons, Patrick Henry, Katrine Milner, Yinmin Ou, Monica Kunz, Alicia Alvares, Saranjan Moganathas, Aarani Chandrasegaram, Etinosa Oliogu, Phumeena Balasuberamaniam, Barbara Gundi, Nithila Sivakumar, Khadija Rashid, Stephanie Lewaniak, Atqiya Fariha, Lavaneyaa Sri, Bashar Alolabi, Carlee Bolton, Xinning “ Tiger” Li, Emily J. Curry, Dana Michlin, Davide Bardana, Ryan T. Bicknell, Heather Grant, Fiona Howells, Peter MacDonald, Jason Old, Jarret M. Woodmass, Sheila McRae, Brittany Bruinooge, Derek McLennan, Rahne Magnusson, Timothy Leroux, Tamara S. Wagner, Michaela Kopka, Mark Heard, Greg Buchko, Sarah Kerslake, Rachel M. Frank, Eric McMarty, Andres Barandiaran, Kelly Leach, Kyle Suess, Bruce S. Miller, John A. Grant, Bethany Ruffino, Anand M. Murthi, Shawanna Jackson, Rodrigo de Marinis, Rodrigo Liendo Verdugo, Catalina Vidal Olate, Michel van den Bekerom, Derek F.P. van Deurzen, Sigrid Vorrink, Ydo V. Kleinlugtenbelt, Izaäk F. Kodde, Ellie Landman, Hannie Elskamp-Meijerman, Monique Voskamp, Raúl Barco, Alfonso Vaquero, Abdul-ilah Hachem, Cristina Ventura-Parellada, J. M. Mora Guix, Ferran Gàmez-Baños

Bibliographic record

VenuePilot and Feasibility Studies · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Latarjet procedureMedicineRandomized controlled trialSurgeryAnterior shoulderAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.097
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.097
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1000.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePilot and Feasibility StudiesSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207