MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220834767 · doi:10.1101/2022.03.25.485621

Changes in both top-down and bottom-up effective connectivity drive visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease

2022· preprint· en· W4220834767 on OpenAlex
G. E. Thomas, Peter Zeidman, Tajwar Sultana, Angeliki Zarkali, Adeel Razi, Rimona S. Weil

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHallucinations in medical conditions
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersAustralian Research CouncilCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMedical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustParkinson's UKNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceVisual cortexPsychologyVisual HallucinationParkinson's diseaseResting state fMRINeuroimagingVisual perceptionSensory systemCognitive psychologyPerceptionDiseaseMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Visual hallucinations are common in Parkinson’s disease and are associated with poorer quality of life and higher risk of dementia. An important and influential model that is widely accepted as an explanation for the mechanism of visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease and other Lewy-body diseases is that these arise due to aberrant hierarchical processing, with impaired bottom-up integration of sensory information and overweighting of top-down perceptual priors within the visual system. This hypothesis has been driven by behavioural data and supported indirectly by observations derived from regional activation and correlational measures using neuroimaging. However, until now, there was no evidence from neuroimaging for differences in causal influences between brain regions measured in patients with Parkinson’s hallucinations. This is in part because previous resting-state studies focus on functional connectivity, which is inherently undirected in nature and cannot test hypotheses about directionality of connectivity. Spectral dynamic causal modelling is a Bayesian framework that allows the inference of effective connectivity – defined as the directed (causal) influence that one region exerts on another region – from resting-state functional MRI data. In the current study, we utilise spectral dynamic causal modelling to estimate effective connectivity within the resting-state visual network in our cohort of 15 Parkinson’s disease visual hallucinators, and 75 Parkinson’s disease non-hallucinators. We find that visual hallucinators display decreased bottom-up effective connectivity from the lateral geniculate nucleus to primary visual cortex and increased top-down effective connectivity from left prefrontal cortex to primary visual cortex and medial thalamus, as compared to non-hallucinators. Importantly, we find that the pattern of effective connectivity is predictive of the presence of visual hallucinations and associated with their severity within the hallucinating group. This is the first study to provide evidence, using resting state effective connectivity, to support a model of aberrant hierarchical predictive processing as the mechanism for visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it