MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220842241 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac659

CHANG-ES – XXVII. A radio/X-ray catalogue of compact sources in and around edge-on galaxies

2022· article· en· W4220842241 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Irwin, Jacqueline Dyer, Leonardo Drake, Q. Daniel Wang, J. M. Stil, Y. Stein, Jayanne English, Theresa Wiegert

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of CalgaryQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEuropean Space AgencyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyAssociated UniversitiesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyAstronomyLuminosityRadio galaxyHaloActive galactic nucleus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present catalogues of discrete, compact radio sources in and around the discs of 35 edge-on galaxies in the Continuum Halos in Nearby Galaxies – an EVLA Survey. The sources were extracted using the pybdsf program at both 1.6 GHz (L band) and 6.0 GHz (C band) from matching resolution (≈3 arcsec) data. We also present catalogues of X-ray sources from Chandra data sets for 27 of the galaxies. The sources at the two radio frequency bands were positionally cross-correlated with each other, and the result cross-correlated with the X-ray sources. All catalogues are included for download with this paper. We detect a total of 2507 sources at L band and 1413 sources at C band. 75 sources have been successfully cross-correlated in both radio bands plus X-ray. Three new nuclear sources are candidates for low luminosity active galactic nuclei in NGC 3877, NGC 4192, and NGC 5792; the one in NGC 3877 also appears to be variable. We also find new nuclear sources in two companion galaxies: NGC 4435 (companion to NGC 4438) and NGC 4298 (companion to NGC 4302). We have also discovered what appears to be a foreground double star; each star has X-ray emission and there is radio emission at both L band and C band in between them. This could be a colliding wind binary system. Suggestions for follow-up studies are offered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207