MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220844262 · doi:10.1155/2022/4849928

Global COVID-19 Epidemic Prediction and Analysis Based on Improved Dynamic Transmission Rate Model with Neural Networks

2022· article· en· W4220844262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yanyu Ding, Jiaxing Li, Weiliang Song, Xiaojin Xie, Guoqiang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Problems in Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransmission (telecommunications)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkResidualNonlinear systemConjugate gradient methodEpidemic modelEconometricsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPopulationTelecommunicationsDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cross-regional spread of COVID-19 had a huge impact on the normal global social order. This paper aims to build an improved dynamic transmission rate model based on the conjugate gradient neural network predicting and analyzing the global COVID-19 epidemic. First, we conduct an exploratory analysis of the COVID-19 epidemic from Canada, Germany, France, the United States, South Korea, Iran, Spain, and Italy. Second, a two-parameter power function is used for the nonlinear fitting of the dynamic transmission rate on account of data-driven approaches. Third, we correct the residual error and construct an improved nonlinear dynamic transmission rate model utilizing the conjugate gradient neural network. Finally, the inflection points of the global COVID-19 epidemic and new outbreaks, as well as the corresponding existing cases are predicted under the optimal sliding window period. The experimental results show that the model presented in this paper has higher prediction accuracy and robustness than some other existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Problems in EngineeringSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207