MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220844337 · doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2022.03.004

The Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography: A year in review 2021

2022· editorial· en· W4220844337 on OpenAlexaff
Márton Kolossváry, Anna Reid, Andrea Baggiano, Prashant Nagpal, Arzu Canan, Subhi J. Al’Aref, Daniele Andreini, João L. Cavalcante, Carlo N. De Cecco, Anjali Chelliah, Marcus Y. Chen, Andrew D. Choi, Damini Dey, Timothy Fairbairn, Maros Ferencik, Heidi Gransar, Harvey S. Hecht, Jonathan Leipsic, Michael T. Lu, Mohamed Marwan, Pál Maurovich‐Horvat, Ming‐Yen Ng, Edward Nicol, Gianluca Pontone, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Seamus P. Whelton, Michelle C. Williams, Armin Arbab‐Zadeh, Kanwal M. Farooqi, Jonathan Weir‐McCall, Gudrun Feuchtner, Todd C. Villines

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cardiovascular computed tomography · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchAbbott VascularHong Kong GovernmentIsrael Cancer Research FundDepartment of Health and Social CareDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAbbott Northwestern Hospital FoundationSiemens Medical Solutions USAHealth and Medical Research FundBritish Heart FoundationBoston Scientific CorporationEdwards LifesciencesGeneral ElectricNational Institutes of HealthMedtronicAstraZenecaSiemens HealthineersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreKowa CompanyBayer FundFood and Health BureauNorthwestern University
KeywordsEditorial boardMedicineCoronary artery diseaseComputed tomographyImpact factorMedical physicsLibrary scienceRadiologyCardiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.014
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of cardiovascular computed tomographySame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207