Transfer learning for estimating dynamic precipitation across different climate models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variations in the global water cycle are among the most impact-relevant consequences of climate change to human society. However, large uncertainties exist in regional precipitation trends due to the presence of internal variability, limited coverage of observational data, and model deficiencies. Dynamical adjustment methods have been developed to quantify the role of circulation-induced variability in relevant climate variables such as precipitation and temperature. By subtracting the latter, the thermodynamic signals are expected to remain in the residuals, therefore increasing the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of trend estimates. However, dynamical adjustment for high-resolution spatial and temporal data remains challenging, especially over heterogeneous terrain such as the Alps. In this study, we build upon the Latent Linear Adjustment Autoencoder (LLAAE), a new statistical model introduced by Heinze-Deml et al., (2021, Geoscientific Model Development 14(8), pp. 4977-4999, doi:10.5194/gmd-2020-275.) that combines dynamical adjustment techniques with elements of deep learning. By combining a linear model with a nonlinear deep neural network, the method has shown great promise in extracting the forced thermodynamic components of high-resolution winter precipitation over Europe. So far, this model has only been trained and tested on different members of the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CanESM2). Here, we illustrate and evaluate the LLAAE in the context of transfer learning. The LLAAE, trained on 9 members of the CanESM2, is evaluated on 10 different high-resolution (EUR-11) Regional Climate Models of the EURO-CORDEX ensemble. We show, despite large climatological model differences, that the LLAAE is capable of reconstructing up to 50 % of the daily precipitation variance across the spatial domain of the CORDEX-data. Furthermore, trend estimates can be improved when retraining the linear model with relatively few additional data points from the target distribution: Retraining the model with 4000 individual days further increases the explained variance by about 30%, improving the S/N ratio of long-term and spatial trend estimates. This could be particularly useful for future real-world applications such as the detection and attribution of anthropogenic forced regional changes in precipitation and the contribution of the circulation-induced variability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".