MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220847556 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8831

Transfer learning for estimating dynamic precipitation across different climate models

2022· preprint· en· W4220847556 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joel Kuettel, Sebastian Sippel, Christina Heinze‐Deml, Reto Knutti, Nicolai Meinshausen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationClimate modelEnvironmental scienceClimatologyClimate changeEconometricsMathematicsMeteorologyPhysicsBiologyEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variations in the global water cycle are among the most impact-relevant consequences of climate change to human society. However, large uncertainties exist in regional precipitation trends due to the presence of internal variability, limited coverage of observational data, and model deficiencies. Dynamical adjustment methods have been developed to quantify the role of circulation-induced variability in relevant climate variables such as precipitation and temperature. By subtracting the latter, the thermodynamic signals are expected to remain in the residuals, therefore increasing the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of trend estimates. However, dynamical adjustment for high-resolution spatial and temporal data remains challenging, especially over heterogeneous terrain such as the Alps. In this study, we build upon the Latent Linear Adjustment Autoencoder (LLAAE), a new statistical model introduced by Heinze-Deml et al., (2021, Geoscientific Model Development 14(8), pp. 4977-4999, doi:10.5194/gmd-2020-275.) that combines dynamical adjustment techniques with elements of deep learning. By combining a linear model with a nonlinear deep neural network, the method has shown great promise in extracting the forced thermodynamic components of high-resolution winter precipitation over Europe. So far, this model has only been trained and tested on different members of the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CanESM2). Here, we illustrate and evaluate the LLAAE in the context of transfer learning. The LLAAE, trained on 9 members of the CanESM2, is evaluated on 10 different high-resolution (EUR-11) Regional Climate Models of the EURO-CORDEX ensemble. We show, despite large climatological model differences, that the LLAAE is capable of reconstructing up to 50 % of the daily precipitation variance across the spatial domain of the CORDEX-data. Furthermore, trend estimates can be improved when retraining the linear model with relatively few additional data points from the target distribution: Retraining the model with 4000 individual days further increases the explained variance by about 30%, improving the S/N ratio of long-term and spatial trend estimates. This could be particularly useful for future real-world applications such as the detection and attribution of anthropogenic forced regional changes in precipitation and the contribution of the circulation-induced variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations→French-language works237,207→