Aquifer-Stream Exchanges and the Importance of Groundwater Discharge for Maintaining Instream Habitat and Benthic Macroinvertebrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Periods of streamflow cessation and stream drying are increasing in frequency and intensity in many regions of the world due to climate change, land-use change, and increased groundwater pumping. Thus, streams with intermittent flow will likely continue to grow in their global extent, which is thought to already surpass that of perennial streams. Yet, variability in streamflow and aquifer-stream exchange associated with flow cessation and drying is not well understood, nor is the influence of hydrological variability on aquatic communities and their habitat. This study aimed to characterize the heterogeneity of physical and chemical characteristics of habitat and the associated variability in benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) communities in relation to spatial and temporal variability in streamflow and aquifer-stream exchange. Habitat conditions and BMI communities varied between individual sites, riffle and pool habitat, and between an intermittent riffle and a perennial riffle maintained by groundwater discharge. Unlike other studies, BMI richness, diversity, and abundance were consistently higher at intermittent riffle sites than perennial riffle sites, which were similar in BMI community composition to pool sites. High velocity distinguished the intermittent riffle sites, while two flow-loving BMI taxa distinguished their communities. This suggests that site-specific heterogeneity in habitat conditions was a key control on spatial and temporal variability in BMI communities due to the habitat preferences of certain BMI taxa. Low richness, diversity, and high dominance of highly tolerant taxa across the site suggested long-term patterns of extreme variability in habitat conditions associated with flow cessation and drying were the primary control on BMI communities. Thus, the interactive effects of these controls may produce unexpected patterns in BMI community richness, diversity, and composition in relation to longitudinal patterns of groundwater discharge and flow persistence. These findings demonstrate the importance of considering the influence of heterogeneity in environmental conditions at multiple spatial and temporal scales when interpreting relationships between hydrological and abiotic or biotic ecological variable in streams with intermittent flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".