Autonomous Prostate Segmentation in 2D B-Mode Ultrasound Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prostate brachytherapy is a treatment for prostate cancer; during the planning of the procedure, ultrasound images of the prostate are taken. The prostate must be segmented out in each of the ultrasound images, and to assist with the procedure, an autonomous prostate segmentation algorithm is proposed. The prostate contouring system presented here is based on a novel superpixel algorithm, whereby pixels in the ultrasound image are grouped into superpixel regions that are optimized based on statistical similarity measures, so that the various structures within the ultrasound image can be differentiated. An active shape prostate contour model is developed and then used to delineate the prostate within the image based on the superpixel regions. Before segmentation, this contour model was fit to a series of point-based clinician-segmented prostate contours exported from conventional prostate brachytherapy planning software to develop a statistical model of the shape of the prostate. The algorithm was evaluated on nine sets of in vivo prostate ultrasound images and compared with manually segmented contours from a clinician, where the algorithm had an average volume difference of 4.49 mL or 10.89%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".