MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220852966 · doi:10.2118/208888-ms

Characterization of the Giant Chicontepec Tight Oil Paleochannel in Mexico and Integration With Actual Cumulative Oil Production

2022· article· en· W4220852966 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandra Gutierrez Oseguera, Roberto Aguilera

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrophysicsOil in placeOil shaleGeologyPetroleum engineeringPorosityTight oilMineralogyPetroleumGeotechnical engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Chicontepec Paleochannel contains unconventional tight oil shaly sandstone reservoirs also characterized by natural fractures. Chicontepec ranks as a giant reservoir with volumes of Original-Oil-in-Place (OOIP) ranging between 137,300 and 59,000 MMbbls (Guzman, 2019). Although the cumulative oil is significant (440.38 MMbbls) it only represents 0.32 to 0.75% of the OOIP. The objective of this study is developing a new characterization methodology with a view to increase oil recovery from Chicontepec. OOIP in Chicontepec paleochannels was estimated originally at 137,300 MMbbls. Despite several studies using state of the art methodologies, contracting major oil field services companies to test new technologies, and significant investments, the OOIP was decreased recently to 59,000 MMbbls due to lack of any significant success on the implemented projects. This study shows that the key to success is understanding the contribution of natural fractures. This is demonstrated with a new dual porosity petrophysical model for naturally fractured laminar shaly sandstone reservoirs developed in this study. The model assumes that matrix and fractures are in parallel. Laminar shaliness is handled with a parameter (Alam) that is a function of true and shale resistivities, and fractional shale volume. The methodology integrates data from observations in outcrops, quantitative evaluation of cores, well logs and actual production data. Past Chicontepec studies have assumed that the porosity exponent (m) in Archie and shaly sandstone equations, is constant. However, core studies indicate that Chicontepec m values become smaller as porosity decreases. The proposed dual porosity petrophysical model, when applied to actual Chicontepec wells, matches properly the laboratory values of m, and generates results that compare well with actual production data, e.g., the larger the value of fracture partitioning the larger is the cumulative oil production. Pattern recognition allows estimating fracture intensity with a partitioning coefficient, which is calculated as the ratio of fracture porosity to total porosity. The novelty of this study is the development of a new petrophysical dual porosity model for naturally fractured shaly sandstone reservoirs that integrates variable values of m from cores, fracture intensity, and cumulative production of individual Chicontepec wells. Thirty-one wells have been evaluated with good results using the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207