Comparative Cost Analysis of Ambulatory versus Inpatient Endovascular Aortic Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Results: At baseline, activity of FVIII was 80.2% (range 67.1% e 101.2%),FIX was 85.9% (range 67.9% e 107.2), and vWF was 320% (range 160% e 640%); the fibrinogen level was 2.63 g/L (range 2.32 e 3.37 g/L) and D-dimer was 300 mg/L DDU (300 e 700 mg/L DDU).All patients successfully underwent PM implantation.Thirteen (31%) patients with permanent AF received single chamber PM and 29 (69%) received dual chamber PM.All PM were implanted on the left side via cephalic vein.The postoperative course was uneventful.Seven days after PM implantation, the FVIII activity was 80.6% (range 58.7% e 96.8%), FIX was 81.7% (range 69.5% e 87.4%), and vWF was 320% (range 320% e 640%); the fibrinogen level was 3.3 g/L (range 2.7 e 3.9 g/L) and D-dimer was 500 mg/LDDU(range 300 e 1 000 mg/LDDU).PM implantation lead to a statistically significant increase of fibrinogen (p ¼ .005)and D-dimer (p ¼ .023)levels.D-dimer level seven days after PM placement was increased in patients with permanent AF and AV block (both p ¼ .028)but not in patients with SSS (p > .05).Activity of FVIII and FIX after the procedure was higher in patients with permanent AF than in patients with SSS (p ¼ .007and p ¼ .008).Patients with an AV block also had higher FVIII and FIX activity after PM implantation versus patients with SSS (p ¼ .017and p ¼ .013,respectively).Patients with class III CHF had a higher baseline D-dimer level than class II patients (p ¼ .033).Patients with a history of stroke had a higher baseline D-dimer level than other patients (p ¼ .028).Conclusion: Hypercoagulability persists in the postoperative period after PM implantation at least for seven days, which may increase the risk of thrombosis or cardiovascular events.Patients with AV block and permanent AF are prone to increased hypercoagulability after PM implantation, compared to patients with SSS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".