A (NOVA) ECONOMIA DO PROJETAMENTO COMO ESTÁGIO SUPERIOR DO SOCIALISMO CHINÊS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste artigo é o de lançar luz sobre as razões pelas quais o conceito elaborado por Ignacio Rangel de “Economia do Projetamento” guarda grandes possibilidades às pesquisas no campo do desenvolvimento econômico chinês. Para tanto buscamos reelaborar o conceito o enriquecendo com novas determinações e critérios de validação que o tornam à altura do alcance do fenômeno em curso na China. Questões como as possibilidades de superação da “incerteza keynesiana”, a planificação da “destruição criativa”, a soberania monetária e o “pacto tácito de adesão" serão abordadas e tomadas como categorias internas que sustentam, enquanto face empírica, o conceito de Nova Economia do Projetamento. Concluimos afirmando que a Nova Economia do Projetamento se constitui como estágio superior de desenvolvimento do modo de produção dominante à (nova) formação econômico-social que emergiu na China como resultado das reformas econômicas iniciadas em 1978.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".