MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220871535 · doi:10.36239/revisa.v11.n1.p69a80

O conhecimento a respeito da Manobra de Heimlich por mães da rede social Facebook

2022· article· pt· W4220871535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Divulgação Científica Sena Aires · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objetivo: analisar o conhecimento a respeito da Manobra de Heimlich por mães da rede social Facebook, tendo como problema de pesquisa o seguinte questionamento: “Durante o pré-natal na rede pública a mãe recebeu orientações sobre a manobra de Heimlich? Que conhecimento as mães tem sobre a manobra de Heimlich.” Método: Foi utilizada a abordagem qualitativa e método descritivo para este estudo, seguindo os pressupostos de Ludke e André (1986). Resultados: Foram entrevistadas 7 mulheres com idade entre 23 e 40 anos que responderam os questionamentos a respeito da Manobra de Heimlich no pré-natal e falaram sobre seus conhecimentos prévios a respeito do tema. Conclusão: As entrevistas realizadas revelam que as mulheres possuem conhecimento superficial a respeito da Manobra de Heimlich, no entanto esse conhecimento não foi obtido em seu pré-natal, mas sim por conta própria ou por necessidade. Descritores: Engasgo; Manobra De Heimlich; Pré-Natal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it