MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220876838 · doi:10.1177/2050313x221086321

Hypergammaglobulinemic purpura of Waldenström—Unusual and impressive case in a patient with myeloma: A case report

2022· article· en· W4220876838 on OpenAlexaff
Celina DeBiasio, Janelle Cyr, Stephanie Petkiewicz, Steven J. Glassman

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medical Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePurpura (gastropod)Multiple myelomaDermatologyImmune dysregulationLymphomaRituximabImmunologyDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hypergammaglobulinemic purpura of Waldenström is an uncommon disease, which presents mostly in women on the lower extremities. It is sometimes associated with underlying immune dysregulation. Sjögren syndrome is the most common association; however, rare occurrences of the self-resolving syndrome with lymphoma or myeloma have been reported. Case Summary: We describe an unusual and impressive presentation of hypergammaglobulinemic purpura of Waldenström in an elderly female patient with myeloma. Notably, the patient did not have any concurrent connective tissue diseases. Despite her florid presentation, her hypergammaglobulinemic purpura of Waldenström spontaneously resolved within a few days. Conclusion: Hypergammaglobulinemic purpura of Waldenström is a self-resolving but recurrent syndrome, which may be associated with autoimmune disorders or rarely myeloma. Early diagnosis of the syndrome may avoid unnecessary treatment interventions and should prompt screening for underlying diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open Medical Case ReportsSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207