Antibody-Positive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder After Second COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: We report a case of de novo aquaporin-4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder following BNT162b SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.Case Presentation: An 80-year-old South Asian man presented two days following his second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine with progressive left-sided leg weakness and numbness resulting in falls. MRI of the spine revealed a longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis from T3-T4 to T9-T10. Serum antibody testing revealed positive aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies. He was diagnosed with de novo AQP4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and was treated with high dose intravenous methylprednisolone and plasma exchange with some improvement. He was subsequently treated with mycophenolate mofetil and a slow steroid wean.Conclusions: Evidence suggests vaccinations may trigger de novo NMOSD or NMOSD relapses in some individuals. Ongoing vaccine surveillance and research are needed to understand the risk of NMOSD post-COVID-19 vaccinations further.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".