MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220892848 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-285

A Paleozoic accretion history: Igneous and detrital zircon signatures of the Kulutingwak and Danish River formations in the Yelverton Inlet-Phillips Inlet region, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada

2022· preprint· en· W4220892848 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megan Koch, William C. McClelland, Jane A. Gilotti, Karolina Kośmińska, Karol Faehnrich, Justin V. Strauss

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTerraneZirconPaleozoicOrdovicianBasementPaleontologyDevonianGeochemistryAccretion (finance)Tectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ordovician Kulutingwak Formation of Ellesmere Island, Nunavut, Canada is an enigmatic assemblage that occurs exclusively in fault-bounded panels in a critical 30 kilometer transect between the crystalline basement of the exotic Pearya terrane and clastic rocks on the Laurentian margin. The Pearya terrane is hypothesized to have accreted to the Laurentian margin during late Silurian to Devonian time. The Kulutingwak Formation includes metasedimentary, volcanic, and volcaniclastic rocks with local carbonate olistoliths and serpentinite-bearing lithologies that collectively represent a subduction-related assemblage formed in an accretionary prism. As such, this formation has been cited as evidence of an arc-continent collision, giving these rocks a significant role in shaping tectonic models for the accretion of the Pearya terrane, and subsequently, the assembly of the circum-Arctic region during the Paleozoic. Igneous and detrital zircon U-Pb and Lu-Hf data from 11 samples collected from the Kulutingwak and Silurian Danish River formations between the Petersen Bay fault zone (PBFZ) and the Emma Fiord fault zone (EFFZ) record a dynamic early Paleozoic tectonic setting at the northern Laurentian margin. Detrital zircon spectra from the Kulutingwak samples adjacent to the PBFZ show major age peaks at ca. 960 Ma that record affinity with the Pearya terrane basement, as well as peaks at ca. 1820 Ma and 2700 Ma that suggest a Laurentian margin source. Additionally, two samples record the presence of a 502–508 Ma source which is not well-documented in this region. Kulutingwak Formation volcaniclastic rocks further to the south in the EFFZ yield U-Pb zircon ages 456–465 Ma and εHf(t) signatures of -5 to +10, implying association with volcaniclastic rocks of the newly redefined Ordovician Fire Bay Formation, a dismembered arc fragment equivalent to Ordovician arc-related rocks connected with the Pearya terrane. The data demonstrate that there are at least two distinctive components within the currently defined Kulutingwak Formation: one that records combined provenance signatures from the Pearya terrane and the Laurentian margin in the Paleozoic and another that signals the presence of an Ordovician arc at ca. 455–470 Ma. U-Pb detrital zircon data collected from the Silurian Danish River Formation in this region demonstrate affinity with the Pearya terrane, with a major age peak at ca. 960 Ma. Composite signatures of ca. 960, 1820, and 2700 Ma in the Kulutingwak Formation suggest that the Pearya terrane had reached the Laurentian margin in Late Ordovician to Silurian time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→