MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220893703 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2022.3161650

A Reconfigurable 5-Channel Ring-Oscillator-Based TDC for Direct Time-of-Flight 3D Imaging

2022· article· en· W4220893703 on OpenAlexaff
Foad Arvani, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRing oscillatorTime-to-digital converterChannel (broadcasting)CMOSDetectorPower (physics)Frame rateConvertersTime of flightDynamic rangeMaterials scienceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringPhysicsElectronic circuitOpticsTelecommunicationsEngineeringClock signal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) 3D imaging requires the digitization of photon arrival times across an array of single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs). The most critical performance metrics of time-to-digital converters (TDC) in TCSPC applications are their conversion rate (CR), area, and power consumption. This paper presents a multi-channel RObased TDC architecture whose power consumption scales with its configurable resolution for power-sensitive applications. Further power savings are achieved by sharing one RO among multiple TDC channels. We have demonstrated that sharing one RO among five channels reduces the power consumption by more than 75 relative to non-shared architectures. Here, a 5-channel 12-bit TDC is fabricated in 65 nm CMOS with an area of 1920 um2 per channel. It demonstrates CR up to 125 MHz and offers a resolution configurable over the range of 24-133 ps. At a CR of 125 MHz, the TDC power consumption per channel is 0.1 mW and 1 mW per channel at 133 ps and 24 ps resolution, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207