MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220897821 · doi:10.3389/fanim.2022.775272

Effects of Exposure to Heat Stress During Late Gestation on the Daily Time Budget of Nulliparous Holstein Heifers

2022· article· en· W4220897821 on OpenAlexaff
Izabella Toledo, V. Ouellet, B.D. Davidson, G.E. Dahl, Jimena Laporta

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Institute of Food and AgricultureU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsAnimal scienceHeat stressLactationGestationRuminationPostpartum periodThermoregulationMedicineBarnPregnancyBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exposure of dairy cows to heat stress negatively affects welfare and performance during all phases of the lactation cycle. Detrimental effects include decreased milk and reproductive performance, reduced immune status and health, and altered natural behaviors. While we understand how mature cows respond to heat stress, the effects of late gestation heat stress on pregnant heifers is still unknown. Automated monitoring devices were used to document the behavioral activity of heifers during the pre- (final 60 d of gestation) and postpartum (first 60 d of lactation) periods. Twenty-five pregnant Holstein heifers were housed in a free-stall barn and enrolled to heat stress (HT; shade; n = 13) or cooling (CL; shade, soakers and fans; n = 12) treatments during the last 60 days of gestation. All animals were provided active cooling postpartum. Upon enrollment, heifers were fitted with a leg tag, which measured daily lying time, number of steps, and standing bouts, and a neck tag that measured eating and rumination times. Rectal temperatures (RT) and respiration rates (RR) were measured thrice weekly during the prepartum period. Relative to CL, HT heifers had elevated RT (38.8 vs. 38.7 ± 0.04°C) and RR (59.6 vs. 44.4 ± 1.9 breaths/min) during the prepartum period. Heat-stressed heifers tended to spend more time eating (224 vs. 183 min/d) and less time ruminating (465 vs. 518 min/d) during the prepartum period compared to CL, but dry matter intake did not differ. During the postpartum period, HT heifers spent more time eating (209 vs. 180 min/d) during weeks 1–4 of lactation, but rumination time was similar. Lying time was reduced by 59 and 88 min per day during weeks −7 and −6 prepartum and 84 and 50 min per day during weeks 2 and 3 postpartum in HT heifers, relative to CL. The number of steps was greater for HT during the postpartum period, from weeks 2 to 9 (3019 vs. 2681 steps/d). Eating frequency was similar during pre- and postpartum periods, however, based on semi quantitative visualization of the smarttag reports, HT consumed larger meals at night during the pre- and postpartum periods compared with CL heifers. In summary, late-gestation exposure to heat stress affects the daily time budget of first lactation heifers during both the pre- and postpartum periods. Current insights of heat stress effects on behavioral responses of dairy heifers may contribute to the development of more effective management strategies to mitigate heat load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Animal ScienceSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207