Pathogenesis of Aquatic Bird Bornavirus 1 in Domestic Chickens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aquatic bird bornavirus 1 (ABBV-1), classified in the Orthobornavirus genus, is a neurotropic virus that infects wild waterfowl causing persistent infection of the nervous system. Given the conspicuous presence of wild waterfowl in urban areas and farmlands, spillover of this virus into domesticated poultry species is a concern. The goal of this study was to test the ability of ABBV-1 to infect and cause disease in chickens. Two-day-old, White Leghorn chickens (n, 176) were inoculated with ABBV-1 through the oral, intramuscular, or intracranial routes, and sampled at 1, 4, 8, and 12-weeks post infection (wpi) to assess virus replication and lesion development. Chickens became infected only through the intracranial and intramuscular routes, developing earliest infection in the brain by 1 wpi (intracranial group), and spinal cord by 8 wpi (intramuscular group). Except for the kidney of one bird in the intracranial group, no other tissues (including choanal and cloacal swabs) tested positive for the virus. Therefore, while the virus reached the central nervous tissue (CNS) from the muscle (centripetal spread), it inefficiently reached peripheral sites after replication in the CNS (centrifugal spread). Inflammation in the CNS was observed in the intracranial and intramuscular groups starting at 8 and 12 wpi, respectively, and consisted of mononuclear perivascular cuffing. This is the first study to document the pathogenesis of ABBV-1 in chickens, and indicates that this species is permissive to ABBV-1 infection, although less extensively than what is observed in waterfowl. This suggests that ABBV-1 replication is partially restricted in gallinaceous birds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".