Energy-Efficient Interference-Aware Cognitive Machine-to-Machine Communications Underlaying Cellular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine-to-machine (M2M) communications can effectively utilize cognitive radio (CR) to coexist with cellular users in what is known as cognitive M2M (CM2M) communications. In this system, underlay CR is used to manage spectrum sharing among machine type communication devices (MTCDs) and cellular user equipment (CUE) where the CUE are considered to be primary users (PUs) and the MTCDs are secondary users (SUs). Moreover, due to the limited battery capacity of MTCDs and diverse quality-of-service (QoS) requirements of both MTCDs and CUE, energy efficiency (EE) is critical to prolonging network lifetime. This paper investigates the power allocation problem for energy-efficient CM2M communications underlaying cellular networks. Underlay CR is employed to manage the coexistence of MTCDs and CUE and exploit spatial spectrum opportunities to improve spectrum utilization. Two power allocation problems are proposed where the first targets MTCD power consumption minimization while the second considers MTCD EE maximization subject to MTCD transmit power constraints, MTCD minimum data rate requirements, and CUE interference limits. The proposed power consumption minimization problem is transformed into a geometric programming (GP) problem and solved iteratively. The proposed EE maximization problem is a nonconvex fractional programming problem. Hence, a parametric transformation is used to convert it into an equivalent convex form and this is solved using an iterative approach. Simulation results are presented which show that the proposed algorithms provide MTCD power allocation with lower power consumption and higher EE than the equal power allocation (EPA) scheme while satisfying the constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".