MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2022· article· W4220901743 on OpenAlex
S. Wahyudin, Mukhammad Rizqy Firdaus Hidayatullah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness Journal Jurnal Bisnis Dan Sosial · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLikert scaleProduct (mathematics)RespondentStatisticsDescriptive statisticsQuality (philosophy)Simple random sampleScale (ratio)Variable (mathematics)MathematicsGeographyPopulationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the effect of product design and product quality on consumer purchasing decisions of Saint Barkley in the Bandung Region. The research method used is descriptive quantitative research method. Research data obtained from the distribution of questionnaires. The respondent selection technique is simple random sampling with a total of 100 people. The scale model used is the Likert scale and uses descriptive analysis. Product Design variable with the percentage score of the Product Design variable questionnaire is 56.04% in the interval position 52% - 68% in the less good category. And the Product Quality variable with Product Quality variable is 81.28% in the 68% - 84% interval position in the good category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0270.001
Scholarly communication0.0150.013
Open science0.0070.009
Research integrity0.0000.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it