MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220912695 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-2483

The Cambrian volcanic arc terrane: a peri-East European Craton assemblage in the heart of the European Variscan Belt

2022· preprint· en· W4220912695 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Collett, Karel Schulmann, Stanisław Mazur, Anne‐Sophie Tabaud, Igor Soejono

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTerraneDetritusZirconArcheanMassifGeochemistryCratonVolcanic arcFibrous jointMetamorphic rockBack-arc basinVolcanic rockPaleontologySubductionTectonicsVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cambrian age volcanic arc-related rocks crop-out in high-grade metamorphic complexes marking the principal Devonian age suture zone in the Bohemian Massif. The age and tectonic setting of these rocks are established from whole-rock geochemical and isotopic data from basic-intermediate rocks transformed to eclogite and granulite, and U-Pb and Lu-Hf isotopic data of detrital zircon in associated meta-sediments. Recent works have established that these rocks can be correlated on the basis of their age and tectonic setting as well as their Variscan metamorphic evolution with allochthonous complexes in NW Iberia, and potentially, the whole European Variscan Belt (Martínez Catalán et al., 2020). Detrital zircon spectra from the high-grade metasediments associated with the Cambrian volcanic arc are superficially similar to the classically interpreted ‘West African signature’ with Neoarchean, Paleoproterozoic and late Neoproterozoic maxima. Nonetheless, limited Cryogenian input and shifting of the late Neoproterozoic maxima into the early Cambrian is in contrast to Variscan autochthonous complexes. Moreover, Lu-Hf isotopic data show important contrasts in the source of the Paleoproterozoic detritus. The Variscan autochthon is charecterised by Paleoproterozoic detritus with negative ɛHfi values indicating reworking of an Archean crust. However, the Paleoproterozoic detritus in the Cambrian arc terrane exhibits mostly positive ɛHfi values indicating a juvenile Paleoproterozoic source. In fact, the data from the Cambrian arc terrane show remarkable similarity to detrital zircon data from early Cambrian sediments on the southern margin of the East European Craton (Paszkowski et al., 2021). These sediments incorporate significant juvenile late Neoproterozoic-early Cambrian detritus from an as yet unidentified volcanic arc and their whole-rock geochemical composition is consistent with immature sediments sourced from intermediate igneous rocks. If true, this correlation suggests that the Cambrian arc terrane is a peri-East European Craton assemblage and necessitates a re-evaluation of the role of the East European Craton within the Variscan Orogeny. Catalán, J. R. M., Collett, S., Schulmann, K., Aleksandrowski, P., and Mazur, S., 2020. Correlation of allochthonous terranes and major tectonostratigraphic domains between NW Iberia and the Bohemian Massif, European Variscan belt. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 109, 1105-1131. Paszkowski, M., Budzyń, B., Mazur, S., Sláma, J., Środoń, J., Millar, I.L., Shumlyanskyy, L., Kędzior, A. and Liivamägi, S., 2021. Detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf constraints on provenance and timing of deposition of the Mesoproterozoic to Cambrian sedimentary cover of the East European Craton, part II: Ukraine. Precambrian Research, 362, 106282.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→