MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4220917414 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-5563

FaBI: A new collection of flood data and attributes of basins in Italy

2022· preprint· en· W4220917414 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierluigi Claps, Martina Brunetto, Giulia Evangelista, Paola Mazzoglio, Irene Monforte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythStructural basinDrainage basinHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceGeographyBiologyGeologyCartographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The availability of large data samples can be useful in several research areas, including rainfall/flood frequency analysis, hydrological modelling and quantification of the hydrologic effects of catchment heterogeneities. In recent years, considerable efforts have been spent to build nation-wide databases of basin attributes, with catalogs or web repositories in USA, England, Switzerland, Austria, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Chile. We present here FaBI (Floods and attributes of Basins in Italy) i.e. the first collection of hydrologic data and gauged basin attributes encompassing the whole of Italy, that counts 631 basins and their flood records. The collection puts together flood data and other hydrological indices on one side, and many basin geo-morpho-climatic and soil-related attributes. In terms of hydrologic data, the starting base is that of two recent databases, i.e. the Improved Italian - Rainfall Extreme Dataset (I2-RED) and the Catalogo delle Piene dei Corsi d’acqua Italiani. The latter was the main source for identification of the watersheds to consider, that are those for which extremes of daily or of peak discharges are available. On this set of 631 basins a consistent effort has produced the computation of spatially relevant attributes and indices with the condition that each variable derives from a uniform nation-wide coverage. Many attributes are related to the geomorphology of the river network, as Horton ratios, shape and amplitude factors. They were computed by processing a digital elevation model with a 30-meters spatial resolution, through the implementation of the r.basin R algorithm. On these values several quality-control procedures have been applied, starting with a check of consistency with previously published data. The raster river network extracted has been compared with a vector reference one provided by the Istituto Superiore per la Ricerca e Protezione Ambientale (ISPRA), allowing us to identify areas where it was necessary to manually force the digital elevation model. The relation between the length of the main channel and its longest path has been investigated and the Hack’s law was used to double-check the computed main channel length. Several spatial average values of climatological indices have been computed, privileging data gathered from ground stations, that are subsequently interpolated in the space. This attains average values of temperature and precipitation at different time scales, for the first time available in a unique repository. The FaBI collection provides a vast range of new opportunities to perform regional and national-scale hydrological analyses, taking advantage of the hydro-climatologic and morphologic variety of the Italian basins, that represent a vast range of transitions between Alpine and semi-arid geographic environments in a Mediterranean context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→