MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220918979 · doi:10.1097/rct.0000000000001280

Can the Third Part of Duodenum Behind SMA Be Detected With Confidence on CT as a Proposed Mechanism for Imaging Suspected Malrotation in Children? A Preliminary Proof of Concept Study

2022· article· en· W4220918979 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuodenumIntestinal malrotationContrast (vision)SMA*Upper gastrointestinal seriesConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: The aims of this study were to determine frequency and reliability of computed tomography (CT) detection of anatomic landmarks for imaging suspected midgut malrotation in infants and children, and to calculate an estimated effective dose of an upper abdominal CT scan in our patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive pediatric patients who underwent a CT scan that included their upper abdomen between August 2016 and February 2018 were included. Four pediatric radiology consultants independently reviewed CT scans for detection of the third part of the duodenum and defined their confidence level of this through identification of continuity with the pyloric antrum, D1, D2, and D4 components of the duodenum, as well as the duodenojejunal flexure.Interobserver variability was assessed using Fleiss κ for agreement. A dose estimate, per scan, was calculated using the scanner dose-length product and published conversion factors by Deak. RESULTS: Thirty patients were boys. The average age was 7.5 ± 5.4 years (6 days to 16 years). The D3 segment was definitely identified in 70% of scans, with 68% to 73%, moderate agreement between the readers and a Fleiss κ of 0.47 to 0.52. The DJ flexure was definitely identified in only 30.5% cases, with 35%, poor agreement between readers (Fleiss κ of 0.03). The average estimated dose for a targeted CT scan of the abdomen was 0.9 mSv (0.04-2.4 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: The third part of the duodenum, which is integral in excluding malrotation on cross-sectional studies, was "definitely" identified in 70% of CT scans of children in our study, with 68% to 73% agreement between the readers and a Fleiss κ of 0.47 to 0.52.These preliminary proof of concept results demonstrating a combination of a comparable CT dose in relation to upper gastrointestinal contrast studies and an acceptable number of cases delineating the third part of the duodenum with moderate agreement are a first step in suggesting low-dose CT for an imaging diagnosis of malrotation. Malrotation can be excluded in cases where D3 is well demonstrated in the normal position, which negates the need to automatically refer children with bilious emesis to specialist centers for upper gastrointestinal contrast studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computer Assisted TomographySame topicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction DisordersFrench-language works237,207