MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220919378 · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2021.11.026

Long-Term Clinical Impact of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Following PCI

2022· article· en· W4220919378 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Reza Mohebi, Keyvan Karimi Galougahi, Javier García, Jennifer van der Horst, Ori Ben‐Yehuda, Jai Radhakrishnan, Glenn M. Chertow, Allen Jeremias, David J. Cohen, David J. Cohen, Akiko Maehara, Gary S. Mintz, Shmuel Chen, Björn Redfors, Martin B. Leon, Thomas Stuckey, Michael J. Rinaldi, Giora Weisz, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Ajay J. Kirtane, Roxana Mehran, George Dangas, Gregg W. Stone, Ziad A. Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsCordisData Science Institute, Columbia UniversityMedicines CompanyCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaCovidienCardiovascular Research FoundationJanssen Scientific AffairsOrbusNeichNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesSiemens Medical Solutions USABayer FundAmerican Medical AssociationBoston Scientific CorporationChiesi FarmaceuticiBristol-Myers SquibbAstraZenecaAbbott LaboratoriesCSL BehringNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationMedtronicGilead SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesEdwards LifesciencesAbbott Vascular
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous coronary interventionConventional PCIInternal medicineCardiologyRenal functionMyocardial infarctionKillip classAcute kidney injuryCreatinineKidney diseaseHeart failureClinical endpointClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.021
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207