MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220927481 · doi:10.3917/lfa.216.0019

Une étude de la (dés)appropriation littéraire

2022· article· fr· W4220927481 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marion Sauvaire, Stéphanie St-Onge

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Français aujourd hui · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAppropriationArtPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La contribution s’appuie sur des données analysées et interprétées dans le cadre d’une recherche collaborative sur l’intégration de l’écriture réflexive dans une séquence d’enseignement de la lecture du Parfum de Patrick Süskind (1985), au cinquième secondaire québécois (15-16 ans). Elle vise à enrichir la discussion théorique sur le processus réflexif de (dés)appropriation qui apparait particulièrement saillant quand le personnage est impropre à l’identification affective et axiologique des lecteurs, comme c’est le cas de du personnage, Jean-Baptiste Grenouille. L’écriture se présente alors comme une intéressante médiation heuristique d’appropriation du monde du texte qui permet de se désapproprier de soi comme lecteur en se distanciant de sa lecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Français aujourd huiSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207