Vascular Aging Estimation Based on Artificial Neural Network Using Photoplethysmogram Waveform Decomposition: Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For the noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness, a well-known indicator of arterial aging, various features based on the photoplethysmogram and regression methods have been proposed. However, whether because of the existing characteristics not accurately reflecting the characteristics of the incident and reflected waveforms of the photoplethysmogram or because of the lack of expressive power of the regression model, a reliable arterial stiffness assessment technique based on a single photoplethysmogram has not yet been proposed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to discover highly correlated features from the incident and reflected waves decomposed from a photoplethysmogram waveform and to develop an artificial neural network-based regression model for the assessment of vascular aging using newly derived features. METHODS: We obtained photoplethysmograms from 757 participants. All recorded photoplethysmograms were segmented for each beat, and each waveform was decomposed into incident and reflected waves by the Gaussian mixture model. The 26 basic features and 52 combined features were defined from the morphological characteristics of the incident and reflected waves. The regression model of the artificial neural network was developed using the defined features. RESULTS: In correlation analysis, the features from the amplitude of the reflected wave and the skewness of the photoplethysmogram showed a relatively strong correlation with the participant's real age. In the estimation of real age, the artificial neural network model showed 10.0 years of root mean square error. Its estimated age and real age had a strong correlation of 0.63 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study proved that the features defined from the reflected wave and skewness of the photoplethysmogram are useful to assess vascular aging. Moreover, the regression model of artificial neural network using these features shows the feasibility for the estimation of vascular aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".