MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220930964 · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00043-1

Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4220930964 on OpenAlexaff
Jie Li, Jian Luo, Ivan Petrovitch Pavlov, Yonatan Perez, Wei Tan, Oriol Roca, Elsa Tavernier, Aileen Kharat, Bairbre McNicholas, Miguel Ibarra‐Estrada, David Vines, Nicholas A. Bosch, Garrett Rampon, Steven Q. Simpson, Allan J. Walkey, Michael Fralick, Amol A. Verma, Fahad Razak, Tim Harris, John G. Laffey, Claude Guérin, Stéphan Ehrmann, Sara Mirza, Luzheng Xue, Ian Pavord, Patrice Plamondon, Dev Jayaraman, Jason Shahin, Joseph Dahine, Anne Kulenkamp, Andrés Pacheco

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSinai Health SystemUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisObservational studyRandomized controlled trialMEDLINEIntubationSupine positionAdverse effectRelative riskStudy heterogeneityPublication biasProne positionIntensive care medicineInternal medicineConfidence intervalSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.029
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations184
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Respiratory MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207