The DNA-based global positioning system—a theoretical framework for large-scale spatial genomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present GPS-seq, a theoretical framework that enables massively scalable, optics-free spatial transcriptomics. GPS-seq combines data from high-throughput sequencing with manifold learning to obtain the spatial transcriptomic landscape of a given tissue section without optical microscopy. In this framework, similar to technologies like Slide-seq and 10X Visium, tissue samples are stamped on a surface of randomly-distributed DNA-barcoded spots (or beads). The transcriptomic sequences of proximal cells are fused to DNA barcodes, enabling the recovery of a transcriptomic pixel image by high-throughput sequencing. The barcode spots serve as “anchors” which also capture spatially diffused “satellite” barcodes, and therefore allow computational reconstruction of spot positions without optical sequencing or depositing barcodes to pre-specified positions. In theory, it could generate 100 mm × 100 mm spatial transcriptomic images with 10-20 μm resolution by localizing 10 8 DNA-barcoded pixels with a single Illumina NovaSeq run. The general framework of GPS-seq is also compatible with standard single-cell (or single-nucleus) capture methods, and any modality of single-cell genomics, such as sci-ATAC-seq, could be transformed into spatial genomics in this strategy. We envision that GPS-seq will lead to breakthrough discoveries in diverse areas of biology by enabling organ-scale imaging of multiple genomic statuses at single-cell resolution for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".